The Qur’anic Reading and Its Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66362/iji.v2i3.40Keywords:
maqasid al-shari'ah, contextual interpretation, systematic reading, religious pluralism, usul al-fiqh, ijtihadAbstract
This paper examines the relationship between Qur’anic interpretation and interpretive methodology, arguing that the meaning derived from the Qur’an depends fundamentally on the reader’s methodological approach. It critiques fragmented, selective, and literalist readings that isolate verses from their textual, historical, and ethical contexts, thereby distorting the Qur’an’s intended message. The study emphasizes the necessity of systematic and holistic interpretation grounded in contextual analysis, particularly through the observation of intended meaning embodied in the text. It further explores the historical development of Islamic jurisprudence, including ijtihad, qiyas, and maqasid al-shari‘ah, highlighting efforts by Muslim jurists to relate revelation to the changing social realities. Applying the maqasidi framework to issues such as war and peace, the paper argues that the Qur’an advances a coherent moral vision centered on justice, human dignity, compassion, and peace. The paper concludes that comprehensive interpretation is essential for preserving the ethical integrity and universal relevance of the Qur’anic message.
References
Al-Ash‘arī, A. H. (n.d.). Al-ibāna ‘an uṣūl al-diyāna. Dār al-Anṣār.
Al-Ghazālī, M. (1991). Kayfa nata‘āmal ma‘a al-Qur’ān. Dār al-Shuruq.
Al-Jabbār, ‘A. (1965). Sharḥ al-uṣūl al-khamsa. Maktabat Wahbah.
Al-Shāfi‘ī, M. ibn I. (1940). Al-risālah. Maktabat al-Halabī.
Al-Shāfi‘ī, M. ibn I. (1979). Al-risālah (2nd ed.). Dār al-Turāth.
Al-Shāṭibī, A. I. (n.d.). Al-muwāfaqāt fī uṣūl al-sharī‘ah. Dār al-Ma‘rifah.
Al-Suyuṭī, J. (2002). Lubāb al-nuqūl fī asbāb al-nuzūl. [Publisher not identified].
Al-Wāḥidī. (1991). Asbāb al-nuzūl. [Publisher not identified].
Asad, M. (1980). The message of the Qur’ān. Dār al-Andalus.
Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah as philosophy of Islamic law. IIIT.
Esack, F. (1997). Qur’ān, liberation and pluralism. Oneworld.
Ibn al-Qayyim. (1991). I‘lām al-muwaqqe‘īn. Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Izutsu, T. (2002). Ethico-religious concepts in the Qur’ān. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Jackson, S. A. (2009). Islam and the problem of Black suffering. Oxford University Press.
Kelsay, J. (1993). Islam and war. Westminster/John Knox Press.
Khadduri, M. (1955). War and peace in the law of Islam. Johns Hopkins Press.
Murata, S., & Chittick, W. (1994). The vision of Islam. Paragon House.
Nasr, S. H. (Ed.). (2015). The study Quran. HarperOne.
Rahman, F. (1982). Islam and modernity. University of Chicago Press.
Rahman, F. (2009). Major themes of the Qur’ān. Beacon Press.
Rippin, A. (Ed.). (1988). Approaches to the history of the interpretation of the Qur’ān. Oxford University Press.
Safi, L. M. (1998a). Tensions and transitions in the Muslim world. University Press of America.
Safi, L. M. (1998b). ‘Imāl al-‘aql. Dār al-Fikr.
Safi, L. M. (2010). The Qur’ānic narrative. Praeger.
Smith, M. (1936). Islamic rationalism in the fourteenth century. Cambridge University Press.
Spencer, R. (2005a). The politically incorrect guide to Islam. Regnery Publishing.
Spencer, R. (2005b). Jihadism and the Qur’ān. Front Page Magazine.
Watt, W. M. (1973). The formative period of Islamic thought. Edinburgh University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Louay Safi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
