Faith in the Unseen from the Modern Perspective of Quantum Physics

Authors

  • Azeez Abdullah Barzinjy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66362/iji.v1i3.10

Abstract

Unseen is an essential component of the Muslim faith as mentioned in many verses in Qur’an and many Hadiths. Thus, the significance of having faith is to believe in something unseen. Accordingly, a belief in nothingness is simply a rejection of the belief in the unseen. It should be recalled here that Allah (S.W.T), Who has the full knowledge of the worlds of the seen and the unseen, has guaranteed the true believers great rewards. Allah (S.W.T) says: Indeed, those who fear their Lord Unseen will have forgiveness and great reward (Al-Mulk, 12).

Scientists believe that the accurate image of the real ingredient can never be entirely understood in this physical Universe since humans are limited by their physical apparatuses. Hence, there must be other states, but humans have no apparatus to observe and understand them. What exactly does the unseen mean?

Quantum physics, which had its bases at the beginning of the 20th century, is an extremely dedicated pattern of science, which unlike Newtonian physics investigates and clarifies how the whole thing in the visible world comes into being. It is fundamentally studying the nature of physical existence beginning at the subatomic, unseen, level. Additionally, quantum physics divides nature into two parts; on one side of the partition there is the observed system whereas there is the observer on the other side. One difficulty is where you place the isolating line, which relies upon who is doing the observation? More topical findings in quantum physics are rapidly mutating the world in an exceedingly extraordinary and optimistic manner.

Unlike classical physics, awareness crosses the threshold of quantum theory and circumstance at the onset. Thus, there is no way to interpret quantum theory without in some way addressing awareness. Unambiguously, awareness takes an obvious and strong role. Otherwise stated, it is avoided by presenting the concept of hidden variables. They, generally, start with the assumption that the physical world should be dealt with unaccompanied by the human observer. The Many Worlds interpretation, consistently, is vital to quantum interpretations since it brings about the ultimate observer outside of space and time. This has obvious theistic implications; therefore, the theologians have not been very keen to attribute to Allah (S.W.T) the role of ultimate observer who brings the whole quantum Universe into being. Arguably, there are parallel Universes mentioned within the Qur’an that one does not have access to. These worlds are widely talked about within the Qur’an, the world of the unseen and seen, Allah (S.W.T) says in surah Al-Ra’d:9; “All-Knower of the unseen and the seen, the Greatest, the Highest”. Accordingly, believe in the Ghaib: literally means a thing not Seen. 

This investigation, with the aim of redirecting the focus of the scientists, emphasized that there are no discrepancies between some of Quantum physics’ interpretation and the belief in the unseen. Therefore, the systematic analysis posed by the authors in this study, through three Qur’anic examples, namely, Moses and Al- Khidr, Joseph (P.U.H) and regaining sight for Jacob (P.U.H) and Prophet Solomon’s death and the Jinns, attempt to analyze these apparently manifold subjects, with the purpose of analyzing the Qur’anic concepts and universalizing the perceptions of quantum physics.

References

Abdul-Rahman, M.S., Islam: Questions and Answers. 2003: MSA Publication Limited.

Al-Ghazali, S. Tahafut al-falasifah [incoherence of the philosophers/translated into English by Sabih Ahmad Kamali. in Lahore: Pakistan Philosophical Congress. 1963.

Aerts, D. and M.S. de Bianchi, Many-measurements or many-worlds? A dialogue. Foundations of Science, 2015. 20(4): p. 399-427.

Bach, R., et al., Controlled double-slit electron diffraction. New Journal of Physics, 2013. 15(3): p. 033018.

Barrett, J.A., Many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. Compendium of Quantum Physics, 2009: p. 363-367.

Bohm, D., A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of" hidden" variables. I. Physical Review, 1952. 85(2): p. 166.

Camilleri, K., Constructing the myth of the Copenhagen interpretation. Perspectives on Science, 2009. 17(1): p. 26-57.

Carter, T.F., God does not play dice with the Universe, or does He? Anthropological interlocutions of sport and religion. Religion and Society, 2012. 3(1): p. 142-162.

Craig, W.L., 'What Place, then, for a Creator?': Hawking on God and Creation. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1990. 41(4): p. 473-491.

Crehore, A.C., The Mystery of Matter and Energy: Recent Progress As to the Structure of Matter. 2008: BiblioBazaar.

Cushing, J.T., A. Fine, and S. Goldstein, Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal. 2013: Springer Netherlands. Penrose, R., The Road To Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe. 2016: Random House.

Dapprich, J.P. and A. Schuster, Philosophy and Logic of Quantum Physics: An Investigation of the Metaphysical and Logical Implications of Quantum Physics. 2015:

Davies, P., Mind of God: The Scientific Basis for a Rational World. 1993: Simon & Schuster.

Davisson, C. and L.H. Germer, Diffraction of electrons by a crystal of nickel. Physical review, 1927. 30(6): p. 705.

DeWitt, B.S. and N. Graham, The many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. 2015: Princeton University Press.

De Broglie, L., Recherches sur la théorie des quanta. 1924, Migration-université en cours d'affectation.

Deutsch, D., Quantum theory as a universal physical theory. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 1985. 24(1): p. 1-41.

Deutsch, D. Quantum theory, the Church-Turing principle and the universal quantum computer. in Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 1985. The Royal Society.

Dolphin, P., The Uncertainty Principle. 2015: Coretext Books.

Einstein, A., B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical review, 1935. 47(10): p. 777.

Everett III, H., ``The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics,''(BS DeWitt and N. Graham, Eds.), Princeton UP, Princeton, 1986; JA Wheeler. Rev. Mod. Phys, 1957. 29: p. 463.

Falkenberg, E.D., Radioactive decay caused by neutrinos? Apeiron, 2001. 8(2): p. 32- 45.

Ferrero, M., et al., A further review of the incompatibility between classical principles and quantum postulates. Foundations of science, 2013: p. 1-14.

Folse, H.J. Niels Bohr, complementarity, and realism. in PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. 1986. Philosophy of Science Association.

Gomatam, R., Niels Bohr’s Interpretation and the Copenhagen Interpretation—Are the Two Incompatible? Philosophy of Science, 2007. 74(5): p. 736-748.

Griffiths, D.J., Introduction to quantum mechanics. 2016: Cambridge University Press.

Harding, K., Causality then and now: Al Ghazali and quantum theory. American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, 1993. 10(2): p. 165.

Hawking, S., Black Holes and Baby Universes and Other Essays: And Other Essays. 2011: Random House Publishing Group.

Henderson, J.R., Classes of Copenhagen interpretations: Mechanisms of collapse as typologically determinative. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 2010. 41(1): p. 1-8.

Kisak, P.F., Quantum Entanglement !: ... Spooky Action at a Distance. 2016: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

Lang, Peter GmbH. Devji, U.Y., Al-Ghazali and Quantum Physics: A Comparative Analysis of the Seventeenth Discussion of" Tahafut Al-Falasifa" and Quantum Theory. 2005.

Laszlo, E., Quantum shift in the global brain: How the new scientific reality can change us and our world. 2008: Inner Traditions/Bear & Co.

Lowe, E.J., Miracles and laws of nature. Religious Studies, 1987. 23(02): p. 263-278.

Nagasawa, M., Schrödinger Equations and Diffusion Theory. 2012: Springer Basel.

Plotnitsky, A., Niels Bohr and Complementarity: An Introduction. 2012: Springer New York.

Polkovnikov, A., et al., Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2011. 83(3): p. 863.

Schrödinger, E., An undulatory theory of the mechanics of atoms and molecules. Physical Review, 1926. 28(6): p. 1049.

Squires, E.J., The Mystery of the Quantum World. 1994: CRC Press.

Tanona, S., Idealization and formalism in Bohr’s approach to quantum theory. Philosophy of Science, 2004. 71(5): p. 683-695.

The International Journal of Islam, January 2024 Volume 1, Issue 3. ISSN: 2572-5556

Wikipedia, S., Wave Mechanics: Frequency, Double-Slit Experiment, Doppler Effect, Phase, Diffraction, Phase Velocity, Interference, Wave Equation, Huygens-Fresnel Pr. 2013: University-Press Org.

Wineland, D.J., Nobel Lecture: Superposition, entanglement, and raising Schrödinger’s cat. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2013. 85(3): p. 1103.

Young, T., The Bakerian lecture: On the theory of light and colors. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1802. 92: p. 12-48.

Yusuf, A.A., An English Interpretation of the Holy Qur-An. 2007: Lushena Books.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-15

How to Cite

Azeez Abdullah Barzinjy. (2024). Faith in the Unseen from the Modern Perspective of Quantum Physics. The International Journal of Islam, 1(3), 15. https://doi.org/10.66362/iji.v1i3.10