The Qur’an, Reason, and Revelation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66362/iji.v1i3.12Keywords:
Islam, Qur’an, Reason, Revelation, Logical Arguments, Rational Discourse, Logos, Argumentation, Reflection, Understanding, Common Sense, Intelligibility, Persuasion, Scholastic Reasoning, Enlightenment Reasoning, Scientific Reasoning, Relativism, Utilitarianism, Islamic Rationality, Quantitative Rationality, Qualitative Rationality, Karl Jasper, Morality Reformation, SpiritualityAbstract
The Qur'an places a strong emphasis on the importance of human reason, critical thinking, logical argumentation, and common sense. It values the use of human intellect to understand the world, theology, morality, and the human mind. In the Qur'an, faith and reason are seen as interconnected, like two sides of the same coin. It assumes that humans are rational beings capable of critical thought and open to persuasion. Logical reasoning and argumentation are integral to the message of the Qur'an. Rational discourse is so ingrained in the Qur'an that it becomes second nature. In contrast to some Christian theological perspectives, the Qur'an maintains a positive view of humanity's rational capabilities. The concept of reason in the Qur'anic perspective is a comprehensive concept that merges elements of Greek philosophical ideas, Enlightenment principles, Scholastic theological thinking, and Islamic tradition into one integrated whole to form a unique approach to reason and rationality. Reason and revelation are not only compatible, they are essentially supplemental.
References
Rosalind Ward Gwynne, Logic, Rhetoric and Legal Reasoning in the Qur’an: God’s Arguments, New York, Routledge, 2004, p. i
See Gwynne, Logic, Rhetoric and Legal Reasoning in the Qur’an, p. ix
See Izutsu, God and Man, p. 144
See John Walbridge, God and Logic in Islam: The Caliphate of Reason, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011, p. 16
See Kate Zebiri, “Argumentation” in Andrew Rippin ed., The Blackwell Companion to the Qur’an, Oxford, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2006, p. 267 ff
See R. J. Sternberg, Cognitive Psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth., 2009, p. 578; David Zarefsky, Argumentation: The Study of Effective Reasoning, Chantilly, VA, The Teaching Company, 2002, part 1, p. 7ff
See Shabbir Akhtar, Islam As Political Religion, New York, Routledge, 2011, p. 189
See Shah, Islam’s Reformation of Christianity, p. 248ff
See Shah, Islam’s Reformation of Christianity, p. 249ff
See Shah, Islam’s Reformation of Christianity, p. 252 ff
See Shah, Islam’s Reformation of Christianity, p. 253ff
See Shah, Islam’s Reformation of Christianity, p. 253ff
See Shah, Islam’s Reformation of Christianity, p. 256ff
See Shah, Islam’s Reformation of Christianity, p. 257ff
See Shah, Islam’s Reformation of Christianity, p. 260ff
See Shah, Islam’s Reformation of Christianity, p. 261ff
See Shah, Islam’s Reformation of Christianity, p. 262ff
See Walbridge, God and Logic in Islam, p. 22
See Walbridge, God and Logic in Islam, p. 22-23
See Walbridge, God and Logic in Islam, p. 24
See Zebiri, “Argumentation”, p. 268
See Zulfiqar Shah, Islam’s Reformation of Christianity, Swansea, Claritis Books, 2021, p. 248ff
Zebiri, “Argumentation”, p. 268
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Zulfiqar Ali Shah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.